DOS Attack and Digg Traffic on Web Servers

Everyone loves it when a lot of traffic passing through their website. In fact, many do everything possible to get that traffic in the hope that someone will find what is on their site interesting and will make a purchase from the site. This is the idea, right? Of course it is, but it is a fact that all types of traffic can not be very advantageous if the traffic is not intended. However, there are ways in which it is brought traffic to sites and two of these are DOS Attack and Digg Traffic. There are real differences between the two as regards the way in which lead traffic to websites. Let's just say that one is more vicious than the others.

DOS attack

Dos attack makes the web server pleads for mercy because he is flooded with traffic that can actually be considered unnecessary. There are several types of DoS attacks such as Teardrop and Ping of Death. What these do is exploit the limitations of TCP / IP. However, there are software fixes that administrators manage their systems to reduce the harm that comes from DoS attacks. But just as computer viruses, there are always new attacks being created by hackers.

What do these attacks is to keep the website working properly and usually targeted large sites such as banks and credit card sites. The Teardrop attack sends IP fragments with huge loads that are superimposed on the machine you are targeting. Many operating systems are vulnerable to this attack and can crash the entire system.

There is also an attack called Smurf attack in which floods the Internet by sending packets of information to be sent to the host on a given network. This is one of those methods in which appears a site is receiving a lot of traffic, but no traffic is legitimate. SYN Flood is another one that floods the server to appear as legitimate traffic.

Digg Traffic

Digg is actually a legitimate way to generate traffic to websites. And 'community-based and uses the articles to get traffic. It combines blogging, social bookmarking and syndication to editorial control by users. And news websites are submitted by users and a user-based classification system is used to promote the site. It may happen that the web server is not prepared to handle the traffic in and hangs up in the final analysis, the site for a short period.

However, Digg has met with some controversy because it says users have control over the content of it too. There are also users who have been accused of operating what is called a "Bury Brigade" in which users mark items as spam, which can bury these stories under legitimate users who want to promote, if they are legitimate or not.

The differences

The differences are quite clear that DOS attacks are a way in which hackers maliciously flood systems with fake traffic and can actually disable the use of a web site. There is a legitimate way to get traffic, while Digg is a legitimate method. However, Digg has also met his controversy in which traffic can be directed away from legitimate articles due to "Bury Brigades", which may hinder their ability to promote through the system of Digg. However, as with any system on the internet, there are always ways to compromise the original intent and Digg is no exception. DOS attacks, on the other hand, still do what they are designed to do and that is to attack the web maliciously ....